Tuesday 2 June 2009

The Evolution of Organisation

The Present
Modern organizations are confronting unprecedented situations in the world today, and the future is going to be even more challenging. The current financial meltdown is just a sign of things to come. We confront rapid and exponential change. The pace of change itself is exploding. We have rapidly changing environments, situations, products and markets. And our old model of organization is not going to cut it. It is too slow and cumbersome.

To deal with the rapid rate of change we are going to have to be organizationally quick on our feet, or we will lose opportunities to competitors who are more nimble and quick acting than we are. We need to release the creativity of our people and allow decisions to be taken on the spot. We are going to need to train, empower and enable people to think and act independently and decisively in a way that fulfils what the organisation is committed to.

Ironically, one of the biggest complaints that people have in their working lives is that they do not find self expression, satisfaction and fulfilment at work, especially if they work in large organizations. People feel that their creativity is suppressed and that they cannot fully contribute what they would like to. Organizations are hierarchical, and structured so that individuals cannot change them. People have to give up their autonomy, creativity and self-expression to fit in, succeed or simply survive in an organisation.

The Past
If we go back to the origins of how and why human beings first started to organise themselves we begin to see why organisations are the way they are.

When human beings first started to organise themselves, they did so to deal with situations or circumstances that they were not able to deal with individually. For example, they banded together to defend themselves against predators or marauders. In order to work together for their survival, the individuals had to give up some of their personal power and freedom. These early social groupings could be seen as the first organisations.

As the groupings became bigger and more complicated, strong leaders emerged to control them. Rules and codes of behaviour were developed, and punishments were established as a method of making people stick to the rules. As leaders became more powerful, war lords or overlords demanded that people serve them in exchange for their protection. People were turned into serfs. They were a functioning part of the group, but they had no say, no choice.

Then came the industrial revolution and there was a renewed need for organisation. This time the industrial barons demanded of their employees the same unthinking obedience that the landowners had demanded of their serfs. As a reaction to this there arose the labour movement. However, these new labour organisations were also suppressive of individual freedom. Everyone had to tow the party line.

The fundamental thing about organizations is that they are hierarchical; it is a matter of command and control…but there are huge limitations to this model. People in this model are fundamentally not responsible for the work that they do, and are using only a fraction of their power. This is of little benefit to either them or the organisation they work for.

The Future
What will resolve this conundrum is a new model of organization. In fact from where I stand I see a new future for ‘Organisation' evolving. Hence the title: 'Evolution of Organisation'

What might this evolution involve? Are there any emerging models already?

First let us consider the Internet and what that makes possible:
The Internet is a group of people linked together without any hierarchy (like the knights in King Arthur’s Round Table). Each computer is as important as the other. Each is equally available to everybody. The Internet makes it possible for people to connect and work together across locations, organisations, skill sets, experience etc. It is now feasible to have employees work from home and still be a contributing and significant part of an organization.

Secondly when we consider political groupings like the European Union we see movement towards consensus (rather than confrontation, domination or the majority running the show). The European Union has made it possible for less powerful countries to have a say, as well as countries like the UK, France and Germany.

The process of generating consensus in coalition governments is another model that is pointing the way.

All this is creating the possibility of a new type of organisation never before experienced.

So we come to some critical questions:
What will the organisation of the future be like?
What will it look like and what will be possible?
What are the skills that will be needed to effectively run this new kind of organisation?


In our next post we will address this further, and we welcome your participation in this ongoing inquiry.








7 comments:

  1. During this economic slowdown Genitek Solutions is growing leaps and bounds and becoming one among the market leaders in other service areas under your continous supervision. Hats off to you and i really don't know what to say to you since i'm speechless for your contribution. Without you we would have drowned by now since we were badly hit by this slowdown. You not only made us survive but we are also growing phenominally this financial year. I can't believe this...

    ReplyDelete
  2. The organisations of the future would be rapidly evolving because the exponential growth of technology would make "flat" organisations almost a reality. Yet one question remains.Can human beings keep control over their urge to control other human beings?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice thoughts. And a very pertinent question from Pranay.

    On similar lines here are some thoughts I came across (from Margaret J Wheatley, president Berkana Institute, in an article Supporting Pioneering Leaders). I quote:
    "We have caused many messes in the world, many of them unintentional, because we acted on beliefs and assumptions that could never engender healthy societies.We wove the following beliefs into our practices: that humans are motivated by selfishness, greed, fear. That we exist as individuals free of the obligation of interdependence. That hierarchy and bureaucracy are the best forms of organizing. That efficiency is the premier measure of value. That people work best under controls and regulations. That diversity is a problem. That unrestrained growth is good. That a healthy economy leads naturally to a healthy society...that only a few people are creative...these beliefs are not true and have created intractable problems that cannot be solved with current systems of thought and practice."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pranay,

    You said 'can human beings keep control over their urge to control other human beings?' That is a really important question.

    I think the answer is that it would depend of the context. Inside the current context we operate in, one of scarcity, competition and confrontation it is unlikely that one will give up control. But as we can see the world is moving so fast and changing so much that it is evident that it is futile to try to control, not just other people but also the circumstances. One will need to be able to dance with life and poeple. Generating a new synergy that will be the name of the game.

    I am confident that the new paradigm of life that is coming into existence will force this change. Obviously the one's who get on board first will carry the day.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Are there any emerging models already? >> Yes, the collaborative one is already here. Wikinomics! Linux, Wikipedia are success stries.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That true Flip Flop and I believe that we need a shift in the paradigm of Organisation itself for these kind of organisations to be the norm.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete